Talk:Free trade

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Free trade article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 3 months

Politics: Libertarianism High‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Libertarianism portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as High-importance).

Economics Top‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trade Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Net gain for society"

I modified the wording about free trade being "a large and unambiguous net gain for society" because this is a value judgment that depends on the social welfare function used. The only welfare function under which a net increase in economic surplus necessarily results in a net gain for society is the Benthamite welfare function, which does not take inequality into account. Since many people believe that inequality is important, we either have to state outright that we are equating economic surplus and social welfare for the purposes of the article or avoid value-laden terms like societal loss in the economics section. Qzekrom 💬 ^they_them 04:05, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you had any grounds to modify that wording. Free trade being a "large and unambiguous net gain for society" is worded in a way that's completely consistent with the opinions of the vast majority of economists.Jonathan f1 (talk) 11:54, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Economist

The world's largest free trade area took effect in Africa in July 2020. It is projected to contribute to an increase in GDP and industrial specialization.^[1]

@B. M. L. Peters: I would appreciate it if you didn't remove sourced info with no explanation. Benjamin (talk) 18:36, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ The Economist, "The African century", March 28th 2020.

"colonialism" in Ireland

It's one small line in the article, but the wording is problematic and shouldn't become a habit on here. In the Colonialism section it says,

"Free-trade debates and associated matters involving the colonial administration of Ireland.."

Describing Ireland's status in the 19th and early 20th Century as "colonial" or "postcolonial" is controversial, hotly debated and disputed by a significant number of scholars in and outside of Ireland. The reliable sources saying as much are numerous[1][2][3].

This line needs to be rewritten in more neutral wording consistent with the encyclopedia's standards.Jonathan f1 (talk) 02:13, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Of both win...how is there a "loser" and a "winner"

The article uses those two words wildly... 2A01:E34:EC12:36C0:F18D:D656:AA78:1B1B (talk) 14:07, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Net gain for society"

Economist

"colonialism" in Ireland

Of both win...how is there a "loser" and a "winner"

Categories